Good Political Strategist Useful Information
In each and every society, art and politics don't always move along too well. While in some political circumstances art will be considered as a tool for achieving certain political strategies, in other instances, art is viewed being an enemy of State (government). This really is for two obvious reasons. The first reason is the fact that, political activities like campaigns, rallies and other similar events make use of art forms like posters, printing of t-shirts, banners, bill boards etc, to achieve the maximum results in the set goals of such events. In this way, art just isn't just seen as tool for achieving political ends but in addition as a pure friend of politics because without it (art) politics would find it tough in expressing or communicating its interest to the public (masses) in a manner that might be conveniently understood. For instance, the photographs of political aspirants made accessible in visual forms like posters and bill-boards bring the contestants closer to the people as well as make people to know those they can be supporting even though such people, in most cases, never have the opportunity of meeting the aspirants one-on-one before elections.
Given this scenario, it's common for a person, group or community to identify with a political aspirant (aspiring for gubernatorial, presidential or senatorial positions) by just wearing a printed cap or t-shirt with the image of the aspirant (when it comes to an individual); or mounting a bill-board at the entrance of a community or at strategic locations within the capital city or its metropolis. In this way, art did not only supply a conducive link between people (masses) and those seeking for political offices, but also provides channels under which the aspirants express their interest to the public during election's season. All these make art an excellent friend to politics.
Your second reason is somehow contrary to the very first one discussed above. This really is because when artists produced works that don't speak well of the policies of an existing government, political leaders consider art an enemy. For example, the cartoons in the newspaper dailies or any other periodical publications draw on critical issues that affect the masses which government is refusing to give focus on. A cartoon drawn to ignite or provoke one's thought on the issue of resource control in the Niger Delta, for instance, will depict leaders robust and healthy as the suffering masses could be portrayed in helpless and poverty stricken conditions. The photographs will be satirically represented to amuse and yet draw focus on a problem of critical need to the society. Political leaders within the helm of affairs do consider such cartoons or art works as a setup to sabotage their governments or regimes. In place of considering such art forms as visual commentaries on the need to deal with or correct the ills within mouse click the following webpage society by formulating, implementing and actualizing good/workable policies for the advantage of the suffering masses, they view them (such art forms) within the other way round.
Taking into consideration the two opposite sides presented above, art and politics are intermittently in conflict. This really is because, where genuine art practice thrives, political leaders don't find it easy to manipulate or cheat the suffering masses without art leaking their (politicians') evil plans/secrets. This really is more likely to be the main reason why most governments or political regimes undermine the art sector for fear of not being used against it. In view of that, cultural policies which could bring a positive turn-around and also foster the development along with growth of art in a nation are either frustrated or given no attention. This is practically unhealthy not simply for the progress of art but also for the entire cultural development of a region. Art is definitely an important element of culture and if it suffers, the culture of that region would also suffer irrecoverably.
As a result, if art is essential such which it can used as strong tool or medium for achieving political aims in events like political campaigns and party rallies (to mention just a number of), it should receive appropriate recognition by political leaders who have the power to speed its growth through meaningful policies.
